It
is possible Nigerians did not celebrate the result of Wednesday night’s World
Cup Qualifying game against Namibia that ended 1-1.


Reasons
will be that lots of fans of the Nigerian national team expected an easy win
after last week’s 1-0 victory against Kenya.
But
on Thursday morning, Nigerians woke up with the news that the players once
again rejected their match bonuses and had planned not to travel to South
Africa and then Brazil for the Confederations Cup.
They
won against Kenya and were given $5000 each which they also rejected last week.
Truth
must be told that their win bonuses used to be $10,000 but it was slashed by half
because the Nigeria Football Federation claim funds are low.
Wednesday’s
draw against Namibia also used to attract $5, 000 but they were given $2,500.
A trip back
Now
shortly after the Africa Cup of Nations, the Nigerian Federation announced that
they were going to cut corners financially because things were no longer as
they used to be.
In
doing that a lot of back room staff from the nation’s foremost national team,
the Super Eagles were sacked.
From
the video analyst to the media officer to two assistant coaches and the reasons
was simply the fact that they had less funds to spend than before.
However
many close watchers of Nigerian football faulted some of the cost cutting
measures of the NFF as, maybe, witch-hunting or something of that sort.
Their
argument was that you cannot sack two senior national team coaches to save cost
then at the same time hire a foreign coach for the U20 team.
Then
there was another argument regarding the sacking of the media officer of the
Super Eagles yet leaving media officers of all other men and women national
teams of all age grades on their jobs.
The
Super Eagles have World Cup qualifying matches as well as the Confederation Cup
yet have no media officer whilst all other national teams even those inactive didn’t
have theirs sacked.
But
maybe the NFF was right. There was really not enough money and some heads had
to roll.
Why didn’t the
players take the money?
Maybe
our players are greedy; maybe they play for the national team just because of
the money they can make or else why would they reject $5,000 and $2,500 for
national service?
After
all we flew them first class and put them in five star hotels, didn’t we?
They
should have accepted the money we gave to them. After all they also read and
heard in the news that the Federation no longer had money to be outlandish in
its spending.
If
the players were not greedy, they should have taken the money and played for
the pride of their country because “a little is enough for a man who is not
guilty”.
After
all a great number of them do not have club careers that they can boast about
and need the national team as a launch pad to greater things at club side level
so they should have taken the money, right? Wrong!
Why the players
were right to turn down the bonuses
Having
said all that and played the devil’s advocate, I insist the players were right
to have turned down the bonuses.
A
couple of them get more than that at their various clubs and do not need it but
that is far from the point.
You
cannot claim to be cutting down on cost but still remain an undisciplined bunch
when it comes to managing your finances.
The
players, lot of them were in Faro, Portugal for the AFCON preparations and then
South Africa for the AFCON proper and saw what a jamboree it was.
They
saw people who had no business being at the AFCON go there on the Federation’s
bill.
Now
after the cost cutting measures were put in place, the players were at the camp
in Germany and saw financial recklessness and would have wondered if it was the
same NFF that claimed they had no money.
I
saw pictures of the Mexico friendly and Emeka Inyama, Anyansi Agwu, Aminu
Maigari, Chris Green amongst many other NFF board members who travelled for a “meaningless”
friendly.
I
think there would have been better understanding if the NFF had told the
players that they could only have the NFF president and maybe the Technical
Committee man because of lack of funds but no, it was the same old free for all
travelling.
We
still had “Stakeholders” on the plane to Kenya and Namibia, there were still
girl friends of key people in football on those planes, countless number of journalists;
and yes we have state FA chairmen sponsored to Namibia. All these on the
Federation bill yet the cost cutting measures should only affect the players?
Can
the NFF come out plain and tell Nigerians how much they spent to prosecute the
two away games against Kenya and Namibia (backed with documents) and then also
reveal how much they spent on the away games against Liberia and Rwanda last
year, two games played before the cost cutting measures were introduced and let
us see the marked difference.
The
players know they are being shortchanged by the NFF that is why rejected the
bonuses.

1 COMMENT

  1. Well analysed stance. The players witness an uneccessary carousel of spending on persons not related to the games,suddenly they are short-changed on their bonuses. It's difficult to call but the Confed cup shouldn't be compromised by this brouhaha.

    • As a Ghanaian, I can only offer one suggestion to resolve this mess. Ask some of your Nigerian Mafia compatriots to get busy on the phone and run a few more 419 scams in EUROPE AND AMERICA. Then they can donate the money to the NFF.

      To play on one's national team is the GREATEST HONOR to which a footballer could ever aspire. Shame on your Nigerian players for denigrating that honor in a petty dispute over their personal gain.

Have your say. We'd love to know what you think.